 |  | |||||
 |  |  |  |  |  | |
| 12-28-2006 , 06:53 PM | #1 |
| Amateur Duffer Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 0  | Celebrity deaths With the passing of James Brown and Pres. Ford, and the old saying that people die in 3s, who do you think will be next? |
 |  |
| Sponsored Links | #1.5 |
| Sponsored Links Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 0
| Sponsored Links |
|
| 12-29-2006 , 01:15 AM | #2 |
| Amateur Duffer  Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 0 | Hopefully Hillary Clinton! LOL |
| | |
| 12-29-2006 , 01:02 PM | #3 |
| Junior Duffer  Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: PA
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 0 | Bush |
| | |
| 12-29-2006 , 02:00 PM | #4 |
| Admin  Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 125
Rep Power: 10 | I'll be the eternal optimist and say Osama bin Laden. Should I hold my breath and wait for that one?? |
| | |
| 12-29-2006 , 02:54 PM | #5 |
| Amateur Duffer Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 0 | It looks like Saddam's days (hours?) are limited, so I guess he could be considered #3, but it wouldn't surprise me if it were someone kinda unexpected. Although, all of the suggestions might not be so bad  |
| | |
| 12-30-2006 , 12:01 AM | #6 |
| Amateur Duffer Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 0 | seriously , what do people have against Bush? we finally got a president willing to bring down terrorism even though his image is being tarnished. It takes a man to do that and yet he never blamed useless Clinton even though he had every right. Clinton ignored terrorists and even struck deals with them, he also committed treason by selling our nuclear secrets, luckily a loophole in the law kept him from a trial. Clinton had 8 documented chances to catch Osama but never acted on them. Once in awhile he lofted some bombs to look like he was trying. Then he pardoned puerto-rican terrorists just so his stupid wife would get the minority vote. If you wanna hate someone then hate the terrorists first and the Clinton's second. An No people, Clinton did not balance the budget. The budget was last balanced in 1969. Clinton never even tried. Everytime the republican congress proposed a new budget which would balance the budget by 2009 he shot it down. He raided social security however, cut each branch of the military by %30 and cut all anti-terrorism funds, any many other senseless things, in a weak attempt to balance the books.How he can get elected twice and then his wife is beyond me. A very wealthy and successful man once told me to get ahead in life find out what everyone else is doing and then do the opposite. it makes sense alot of times. Most of the country is either lazy, uneducated or just blindly listens to the liberal media. Bush didn't do it all right but at least he is trying. Clinton benefited from Reagan's run and thought he could coast thru his presidency. Clinton had the highest tax increases in the history of our country and under him we had the latest "tax relief day" ever! His high taxes sent many businesses overseas and put most small businesses out of business! Liberals would rather let states like california go without power than let us dig for oil or build power plants on our own soil. And now that third world countries are using more oil and China increased their consumption some 20% gas prices are rising. Gas is controlled by economic factors not the president!. If each US citizen cut his gas usage by %10 the price of one galllon would drop over 50 cents. I'm an independent who supports the war. What is going on today is just as bad as during world war-II. They wanted to exterminate the jews then and now and terrorism is out of control. When america was polled before WWII, 77% said we should not get involved. Luckily we did or we would be speaking German or Japanese. Good presidents don't follow polls...they lead! and make difficult decisions no matter how it affects their image. Clinton was a sociopath and a coward accused of rape, treason and stealing hundreds of millions of dollars yet this idiot is worshipped like a king. Luckily the republicans were corrupt as well, because if Clinton didn't have dirt on them they would have all showed up to view the evidence against Clinton. Instead the cowards backed down and didn't impeach him because they all only care about their image,,,,sorry about the politics talk fellows.... |
| | |
| 12-30-2006 , 01:10 PM | #7 |
| Junior Duffer  Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: California
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 0 | seems like it was Saddam. |
| | |
| 12-30-2006 , 01:54 PM | #8 |
| Amateur Duffer Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 0 | Saddam Insane is a good one! |
| | |
| 12-30-2006 , 10:02 PM | #9 |
| Admin Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 125
Rep Power: 10 | You know, if Saddam (or anyone around him) had half a brain they would have let him get all the way up to where he was going to step up to the noose and have him shout "Hey guys, enough is enough, I got paid to impersonate Saddam but I'm not going to die for him. He can have his money back!" After all, he did have 3 or 4 body doubles if I remember correctly. |
| | |
| 12-31-2006 , 12:59 PM | #10 |
| Amateur Duffer Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 0 | that'd be one way to "save your neck"  |
| | |
 |
 |